SUFFOLK COUNTY COVID-19 CASE UPDATE – April 1, 2020, 2:30 p.m.

Filed under: Business,Events,Government,Hamlets,Health & Wellness,News |

Suffolk County reported the following confirmed cases and deaths due to COVID-19 through 2:30 p.m. on April 1, 2020

  • To date, more than 19,300 COVID-19 tests have been administered, an increase of approximately 1,700 from March 31.
  • 7,605  confirmed cases  (up 892 from the 6,713 cases that were reported at 2:30 p.m. on March 31)
  • 897 patients are hospitalized (up 189 from March 31), 272 of those are in the intensive care unit (up 43 from March 31) 
  • 69 deaths (up 16 from March 31) 

A breakdown of cases by township reported through 1:18 p.m. on April 1, 2020

Note: this breakdown comprises the information from 7,273 records available to Suffolk County at this time. 

  • Islip — 1,496, up from 1,242 on March 31
  • Huntington — 1,203, up from 1,086 on March 31
  • Brookhaven – 1,082, up from 907 on March 31
  • Babylon —  1,076, up from 884 on March 31 
  • Smithtown — 353, up from 302 on March 31
  • Southold — 152, up from 142 on  March 31
  • Southampton —  123, up from 99 on March 31
  • Riverhead — 93, up from 82 on March 31
  • East Hampton — 26, up from 24 on March 31
  • Shelter Island — 1,  no change from March 31
  • Township not known — 1,668

Deaths reported on April 1 at 2:30 p.m. include:  editors note most people that have died are 60+ with underlying conditions.

  • An male in his age 70s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • A female in her 80s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • A male in his 60s with underlying medical conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • An female in her 80s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • A male in his 70s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • A female in her 80s with underlying medical conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • An female in her 50s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • A female in her 70s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • A male in his 80s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • A male in his 70s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • A female in her 80s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • A male in his 90s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • A male in his 80s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • A male in his 70s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • A male in his 80s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital
  • A male in his 80s with underlying health conditions who was in mandatory isolation at a local hospital

 

Facebook Comments must be signed into Facebook

You must be logged in to post a comment Login